Okay, first off we’ve got good ol’ radiometric dating. Whine all you want creationists about how it is "inaccurate" and "created by satan" but truth is you’ve never been able to show its inaccuracy in a scientific setting, without blatantly misusing it, or just lying about your results. Not too mention that there are also over a dozen different radiometric dating methods all of which give the same results.

Our friend carbon dating is next in line. Just like radiometric dating, creationists have failed to show it’s inaccuracy scientifically. They may point out "errors" but these "errors" are commonly understood limitations to what carbon dating can do. If you give a hammer to a retarded two year old and he starts poking trees with the handle doesn’t mean the hammer doesn’t work. It just means that it is being used by a retarded two year old.

The speed of light also poses some problems with a young earth. The speed of light is constant, always has been. Creationists have yet to show any proof theoretical or empirical that has even hinted at the speed of light ever being faster (if you bring up Setterfield, take a second to actually look into his findings).

Craters pose a little problem as well. The Earth is covered in thousands upon thousands of craters. If all of these craters were somehow formed within the last 6,000 years the Earth would look a little bit different than it does today (by different I mean that it would be a big molten ball of magma, as would be the moon and all other terrestrial planets).

Varves. Varves are annual layers of sedimentary rock. We can count them back hundreds of thousands of years. Also, don’t try to say that "they were all layed down during the flood". That doesn’t work, flood sedimentation looks much different than annual sedimentary layers.

Ice cores. Like varves we can count them back tens of thousands of years. Also like varves we can tell if more than one is lain in a year. Scientists aren’t stupid they get this stuff.

Isochron dating…it’s kind of complicated, but if you want to check it out… http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/isochron-dating.html

Well I think I am going to leave it at that for now. If you have any problems with anything that I have posted, feel free to e-mail me, I’d love to (try) to answer any questions you may have. I do admit in advance though that I am an amateur at this, but practice does make perfect!

You don’t have to read the whole thing, but just look at the little table of contents. Generally, do you think these types of things are helpful, or are they all BS?

Invites woman over to his house, makes dinner, has a beautiful bottle of red wine on the table.

He pours a small amount into each of their glasses. She takes a sip to discover it is a strong liquor the same color of red wine.

Look like he was trying to speed up the wine and dine process a bit, or what?

In his defense, he knew she loved that kind of liquor and really isn’t a red wine type of gal ….

So, unique and thoughtful or insulting?